Case studies
MES

FEA Blast Simulation and Progressive Collapse Analysis of Steel Frames

Compares Abaqus/Explicit results to TM 5-1300 guidelines for steel connections under blast loads and models progressive collapse in 10-story frames.

Published
June 4, 2026
Read time
3 min read
Source

University of Florida researchers used Abaqus/Explicit to evaluate steel moment connections under combined blast and dead loads. Results showed local rotations exceeding TM 5-1300 limits and revealed three-dimensional blast effects not captured by current guidelines. Progressive collapse simulations of 10-story frames demonstrated that horizontal column buckling propagation leads to total collapse and that connection type strongly influences failure sequence.

Key takeaways

TM 5-1300 underestimates connection rotations when blast pressures reflect from multiple surfaces

Dead loads and strain-rate effects increase connection strength but also induce additional twisting

Horizontal column buckling is the dominant mechanism driving progressive collapse propagation

Semi-rigid connections produce cascade failures; ideal rigid connections fail via first-floor column buckling

High-resolution FEA is required to capture nonlinear transient behavior missed by single-degree-of-freedom methods

Market overview

SCR methodology note

Vendor landscape

Leaders

Implementation considerations

Important consideration